Fleshman v. Bibb
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa eo/unty in a proceeding by motion for a judgment for money. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The judgment under review was obtained by W. C. Bibb upon two notes executed by W. D. Eleshman to the Compendium Company, Incorporated, or order, each dated May 30, 1912, and each endorsed as follows: “Eor value received, we hereby transfer and assign to W. C. Bibb the within note without recourse. This 31st day of May, 1912. The Compendium Company, Inc.,, by J. L. Thompson, Pres.” It appears that one-half of the consideration for this assignment was furnished by W. W. Smith, and that he was equally interested therein with Bibb.
The underlying grounds of all the defenses relied upon were fraud…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Greene v. McAuleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Vaughn v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Trustees of American Bank v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- City National Bank v. HundleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Davis v. RodgersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- National Mechanics Bank v. Schmelz National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Anderson v. Clinchfield RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.