Legal Opinion

Parrott v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 12, 1960No. 19554PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, was by a jury found guilty of the offense of obtaining property by means of drawing and delivering a check on a bank in which he had no account, as defined in the laws adopted by the Forty-first General Assembly (1957 Session Laws), Chapter 126, section 1.

Defendant was represented at his trial by court appointed counsel. After the jury had returned its verdict of guilty, defendant’s counsel filed a motion for a new trial and defendant directed a letter to the trial judge setting forth his reasons for wanting a new trial. The trial court considered this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Falcon v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Line v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Gallegos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. People v. GirtmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Ruark v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Peterson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API