Martin v. People

Plaintiff in error (defendant) was' convicted of the “crime against nature,” as that offense is set forth in 1944 Supplement to ’35 C.S.A., chapter 48, section 64 (S.L. ’39, p. 318, §1), and suffered judgment of sentence to the state penitentiary. Briefly, the showing had to do with defendant’s alleged misconduct with one of two sailors of the war service, in circumstances presently to be stated.

The sum of defendant’s assignments of error necessary to consider, is, that, in the course of the trial, in two separate instances, the district attorney so demeaned himself that prejudicial error…