Legal Opinion

Amdyco Corp. v. Urquhart

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 24, 1931No. 4470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the delicate question of the relative rights of employer and employee where the latter has made an invention during his employment. Cases of that character have from time to time been before this court, and the principles involved have been stated in several eases, among which we now refer to Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Hansen, 137 F. 403, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1172, and Ingle v. Landis Tool Co., 272 F. 464. In the latter ease, after referring to the Hansen Case, we said: .“In the absence of an express contract or agreement to invent, the relation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  2. Ingle v. Landis Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  3. Amdyco Corporation v. UrquhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jorgen v. Kierulff v. Metropolitan Stevedore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API