Legal Opinion

Belt v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 2024No. 2:18-cv-03831Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN BELT, et al., : Plaintiffs. : CIVIL ACTION : No. 18-3831 v. : : P.F. CHANG’S CHINA : BISTRO, INC., : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Non-party Professor Charlotte Alexander moves to intervene for “the limited purpose of moving the Court to unseal portions of the record in this case”—namely, redacted monetary amounts in an otherwise publicly-filed Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) settlement agreement. Mot. to Intervene, ECF No. 214; see also Mot. to Unseal, ECF No. 216. For the following reasons, the Court will deny…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hotel Rittenhouse AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API