Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of Seward v. Marsh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1920No. 21302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: William M. Morning, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The city of Seward, relator, applied to the court below for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the auditor of public accounts, respondent, to register municipal bonds of relator in the sum of $85,000. Respondent resisted the allowance of the writ on the ground that the bonds, if issued, would not comply with the terms of the present statute. Relator insists that the bonds were voted and sold according to the requirements of the law then in force, and that the present statute, though providing for different obligations and repealing the act under which relator proceeded, did not destroy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morgan v. City of Falls CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norton v. Kleberg CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Davies v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Murray v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Davies v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State ex rel. City of O'Neill v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API