Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1989No. 88-1129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIMMONS, Judge.

Appellant asserts error in the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea. We affirm.

The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress incriminating statements made by the appellant. The appellant then entered a plea of nolo contendere to armed burglary, sexual battery, and armed robbery. He purported to reserve the right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress, asserting that the court’s order was dispos-itive of the case. The prosecuting attorney, however, made it quite clear that he did not agree that the order was dispositive of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Hardison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Helms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Goings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Maxwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API