Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin R. Dockter, Also Known as Kevin R. Docktor, United States of America v. Floyd Wesley Shulze

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1995No. 94-2972, 94-2974PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Kevin Dockter and Floyd Shulze were convicted of being felons in possession of firearms and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, they contend that the district court 1 erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence discovered in a vehicle they were occupying and in responding ex parte to a question from the jury. Shulze also argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found in his house pursuant to a warrant and in sentencing him to the 15-year mandatory minimum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). We affirm.

I

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Raymond Anthony Miller v. Terry J. HargetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. St. Clair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Caudill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. United States v. Kenneth Howard KoskelaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API