Legal Opinion

Huckaby v. McConnon & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1925No. 8 Div. 775PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is upon a contract of guaranty to secure a line of credit for one Arnold R. Jordan in the future purchase of merchandise from plaintiff. The contract in full appears in the report of the case.

Like other contracts, a guaranty is complete when the minds of the parties meet in mutual assent to the same things in the same sense.

A guaranty in the nature of a letter of credit generally, or to a specified party, to secure future credit for the person in whose favor it is drawn, is usually regarded as a mere conditional offer, not to become binding until the form and sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Adams, Cunningham & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Saint v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Leftkovitz v. First National Bank of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colonial Bank of Alabama v. CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Shur-Gain Feed Div. v. Huntsville ProductionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Furst v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. In Re Southern Cinemas, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API