Legal Opinion

Conner v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1950No. 32086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

Provisions for a supplemental petition such as filed by plaintiff are made by Section 9510-4, General Code, which reads in part:

“Upon the recovery of a final judgment against any * * * person * * * by any person * # * for loss or damage on account of bodily injury * * * f0r loss or damage to a person on account of bodily injury to his wife * * * if the defendant in such action was insured against loss or damage at the time when the rights of action arose, the judgment creditor * * * shall be en titled to have the insurance money provided for in the contract of insurance between the insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Hayes v. Kentucky Joint Stock Land BankOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  5. Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cordell v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Krabill v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rivard v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
  4. STATE BY VAN RIPER v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Elizabeth MacKenzie v. D.C. Unemployment Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API