Hardy v. Vision Service Plan
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
¶ 1 Appellant David Hardy (Hardy) appeals from an order entered by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent Vision Service Plan (VSP) on Hardy’s claims of breach of contract based on the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and tortious interference with business relations. We affirm.
¶2 We must determine whether the District Court properly granted VSP’s motion for summary judgment after concluding that VSP had not breached its contract with Hardy and had not caused tortious interference with his business relations.
PR…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Carelli v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Pablo v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Farris v. HutchinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Prout v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Germann v. StephensMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Montana Trout Unlimited v. Montana Department of Natural Resources & ConservationMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Phelps v. FramptonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Thompson v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep DodgeMontana Supreme Court · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.