Legal Opinion

Estate of Kissinger v. Hoge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 3, 2007No. 58932-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

173 P.3d 956 (2007)

In re the ESTATE OF Pamela L. KISSINGER; Leonard Hoss, Personal Representative, Respondent,

v.

Joshua HOGE, Appellant.

No. 58932-6-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 3, 2007.

Jean Ann O'loughlin, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Mark Leemon, Leemon & Royer PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 Our state's slayer statute has been interpreted to not prevent a non-willful slayer from inheriting. However, a slayer found not guilty by reason of insanity does not, ipso facto, act in a non-willful manner. Under the slayer statute a slayer must…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpinoWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Certification From Federal Court in New York Life Insurance v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Leavy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Cook v. GislerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KissingerWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hoss v. HogeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State of Washington v. Benjamin Gordon Swofford, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State of Washington v. Carl Keith MathenyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API