Legal Opinion

Baughman v. United States Liability Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 13, 2010No. Civil 08-2901 (JBS/KW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge:

Presently before the Court is a motion submitted by Plaintiffs Becky and Stephen Baughman for summary judgment on damages for their successful breach of con tract claim and for assessment of attorneys fees pursuant to New Jersey Court Rule 4:42-9(a)(6) [Docket Item 26]. Defendant United States Liability Company does not oppose summary judgment on damages, but objects to Plaintiffs’ request for attorneys fees, arguing that they should not be imposed in this case and that even if imposed Plaintiffs request an unreasonable amount. For the reasons discussed below,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Martin O. Washington v. Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Martin WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BURLINGTON INSURANCE CO. v. Northland Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Circa Direct LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  3. ARKU-NYADIA v. LEGAL SEA FOODS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  4. FARRINGTON v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. OCASIO v. EADYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API