Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Circa Direct LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 17, 2012No. Civil No. 11-2172 RMB/AMDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BUMB, District Judge.
On March 8, 2012, Defendants Circa Direct LLC and Andrew Davidson (the “Defendants”) moved that they be awarded attorney’s fees and expenses. [Docket No. 40]. For the reasons that follow, that motion is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.
I. Background
A.The Preliminary Injunction
On April 18, 2011, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) filed a Complaint against the Defendants, alleging that the Defendants had engaged in certain deceptive practices. [Dkt. No. 1]. Defendants retained attorneys from the New York office of Venable LLP (“Venable”) to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. IMO Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Bell v. United Princeton Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ismail v. IHI Power Services Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Sehoon Chang v. Able C&C Co. Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026