Legal Opinion
Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate v. O'Brien & Associates
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 24, 1991No. Civ. No. 90-1577-APublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELLIS, District Judge.
In this interpleader action, the claimants to the fund are two real estate brokers who claim entitlement to a $74,000 commission from the sale of a property. At issue is which of these brokers was the selling broker under Maryland law. Before the Court is defendant O’Brien & Associates’ (“O’Brien’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment which is opposed by defendant Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. (“Long & Foster”). Because the material undisputed facts establish that O’Brien was the selling broker, summary judgment in favor of O’Brien is warranted.
*132Summary judgment standards…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Robert Pachaly, Jr. v. City of Lynchburg R.D. Viar William G. Petty, and Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Jose S. De Leon, M.D. Maria G. De Leon, His Wife v. Saint Joseph Hospital, Inc. William L. MacOn Iv, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.