Legal Opinion

Eesley v. Dottellis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1948No. 668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIOOD, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff’s automobile while parked in front of his house was run into by a car which had been left in possession of defendant as bailee, and which at the time was operated by one Laulicht, without the permission of defendant. Laulicht’s possession of the automobile is explained by the following facts found by the trial judge, sitting without a jury.

Maurice DeLalla, owner of the car, took it on October 29 to the defendant’s garage to be repaired. Pie parked it in front of the garage, locked it, and returned the next day and gave the key to defendant and asked him to fix…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Schaff v. R. W. Claxton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Bullock v. DahlstromDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tan Top Cab Company v. ShillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Singer v. MurphyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Davis v. Professional Bldg. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API