Bullock v. Dahlstrom
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s taxicab were in a collision on Washington Circle. There is no question that plaintiff’s car was being operated in a proper manner and that the taxicab, which was proceeding in the wrong direction on the circle, was being operated in a negligent manner. However, at the time of the collision defendant was not in the taxicab and it was then being operated by a female Marine corporal. Her possession of the taxicab is explained by the following facts found by the trial judge.
The corporal had entered defendant’s taxicab as a passenger in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Schaff v. R. W. Claxton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Myers v. GaitherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Lingefelt v. HannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lustbader v. Traders Delivery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Tan Top Cab Company v. ShillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.