Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Federated American Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 10, 1972No. 780-1Published

1DissentWilliams, J.

(dissenting) — The proportionate pecuniary responsibility of the two insurance companies has been fixed upon the basis of the number of joint tort-feasors each company was legally required to shield. I do not believe that this is a correct method of computing the contribution which each company is to make to the losses sustained in the automobile accident.

Generally, joint tort-feasors are each fully liable and there is no right of contribution or indemnity. Duncan v. Judge, 43 Wn.2d 836, 264 P.2d 865 (1953); Mauk Seattle Lumber Co. v. Hoquiam Plywood Co., 5 Wn. App. 577, 489 P.2d 753 (1971).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clow v. National Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Duncan v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Federated American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Galloway v. Southern Farm Bureau InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Greater Seattle Youth for Christ v. Colonial Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API