Legal Opinion

Knesek v. Witte

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 7, 1986No. 01-85-0737-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACK SMITH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, construing a will. In one point of error, appellants maintain that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law; appellees bring two cross-points.

Louise Witte (“Louise”) was married to Roland Hoffmann (“Hoffmann”) until his death in July, 1977. During their marriage, Louise owned an undivided ¼ interest in 44 acres of land, and Hoffmann owned the remaining undivided ¾ interest in the same property. In 1975, Louise and Hoffmann executed reciprocal wills. Each left all of his/her property to the other.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Weidner v. CrowtherTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Magids v. AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., MIAMI, FLA.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 4M Linen & Uniform Supply Co., Inc. v. WP Ballard & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  2. Montgomery v. MontgomeryIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hudspeth v. Hudspeth, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  4. Barker v. Rosenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  5. Knesek v. Witte, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API