Knesek v. Witte
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACK SMITH, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment, based on a jury verdict, construing a will. In one point of error, appellants maintain that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law; appellees bring two cross-points.
Louise Witte (“Louise”) was married to Roland Hoffmann (“Hoffmann”) until his death in July, 1977. During their marriage, Louise owned an undivided ¼ interest in 44 acres of land, and Hoffmann owned the remaining undivided ¾ interest in the same property. In 1975, Louise and Hoffmann executed reciprocal wills. Each left all of his/her property to the other.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Huffman v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Weidner v. CrowtherTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Magids v. AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., MIAMI, FLA.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- 4M Linen & Uniform Supply Co., Inc. v. WP Ballard & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Hudspeth v. Hudspeth, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Barker v. Rosenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Knesek v. Witte, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.