Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1899No. S.F. No. 1764PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPLICATION to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion. '

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

—Application for a writ to prohibit defendant from entertaining jurisdiction in a certain habeas corpus case. One Buchanan was duly committed to the Napa State Hospital for the Insane by the superior court of Yuba county pending his trial upon the charge of murder. A friend of Buchanan, one Muller, presented his petition to the Hon. E. D. Ham, judge of the superior court of' Napa county, setting forth, among other things, that Buchanan has recovered his sanity and is entitled to be discharged from the state hospital and redelivered to the sheriff of said Yuba county to be dealt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re PhyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re BuchananCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Northfoss v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Farleigh v. KellyMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API