Legal Opinion

Bartel v. Charles Kurz & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2015No. MDL No. 875; Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-30511-ERPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

.MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

This case was transferred in January 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E. Bartel (“Plaintiff’), Administrator of the Estate of James T. McQueen, alleges that James, McQueen (“Decedent” or “Mr. McQueen”) was exposed to asbestos while working aboard various…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashmore v. Cgi Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API