Legal Opinion

Cambridge Place Investment Management, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 14, 2012No. SUCV201002741BLS1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lauriat, Peter M., J.

This action arises from the purchase, by nine foreign hedge funds, of residential mortgage-backed securities. As assignee of the claims of the nine foreign hedge funds, the plaintiff, Cambridge Place Investment Management, Inc. (“CPIM”) seeks damages and/or rescission of the securities transactions from the defendants, who are underwriters, dealers, and depositors of the securities at issue. CPIM alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements regarding the securities, in violation of the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act (“MUSA”), G.L.c. 110A, §410.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Doe v. the GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cambridge Place Investment Management, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API