Crutchfield v. Hannigan
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Prager, C.J.:
Frank L. Crutchfield, an inmate at the Hutchinson Correctional Facility, appeals the denial of his K.S.A. 60-1501 petition claiming that prison authorities violated his Fourth Amendment rights in collecting a urine sample from him and that he was denied due process in the prison disciplinaiy hearing, which resulted in his loss of 9 months of good time credit, a $40 fine, 66 days of disciplinary segregation, and 90 days of restriction from privileges. The district court, after considering the policies and procedures followed in the disciplinary proceedings, dismissed his petition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jerry K. Forbes v. Clarence Trigg, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Singletary v. MeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adkins v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Somers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Anderson v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Grinstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Somers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.