Durst Ex Rel. Durst v. Roach
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, C. J.
I. The principles of law involved in this case are well established, and the parties are not in controversy over them. For the most part, there was little dispute about the facts. Trial was had in the district court as in equity, and it is reviewed here de novo. We stated in Barnett v. Blakley, 202 Iowa 1, 5, 209 N.W. 412, 414: “As now used and recognized, in eases involving the custody of children, the writ of habeas corpus operates to invoke the broad powers of the court of an equitable nature, to determine the question of custody of a minor child according as the welfare and best interests…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jensen v. SorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Jensen v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Maron v. MaronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Ellison Ex Rel. Nardicchio v. PlattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Halstead Ex Rel. Lee v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Finken Ex Rel. Finken v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Thein v. SquiresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Gering v. BirdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.