Anderson v. Russell Miller Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
Anderson had been an employe of respondent employer over a period of more than 29 years, the best part of his working life. He was nearing his sixtieth birthday when the fatal accident occurred. Unemployment at the time of his death, and over a long period immediately preceding, was the most important local and national problem. There is no suggestion that he was ever disobedient to orders. It is obvious, too, that he would not risk his life by going into the mill and thereby expose himself to lethal gases had he known there were such. In the very nature of things he was doing what to him…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Nickerson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. Russell Miller Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936