Legal Opinion

Chiarello v. Guerin Special Motor Freight

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 28, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

22 N.J. Super. 431 (1952)

92 A.2d 136

MARY CHIARELLO AND JAMES CHIARELLO, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

GUERIN SPECIAL MOTOR FREIGHT, A CORPORATION, AND LEONARD MAHONEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided October 28, 1952.

Mr. Howard K. Shaw, attorney for the defendants, for the motion.

Mr. Nicholas M. Giordano, Jr., attorney for the plaintiffs, opposed.

WOODS, J.S.C.

This matter is before us on a motion to strike the summons and complaint on the following grounds:

1. That service of process was insufficient.

2. That this court lacks jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants.

From the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Smethurst v. Proprietors of Independent Congregational Church in Barton SquareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Hand v. FrazerNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Galloway v. Wyatt Metal & Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. Sipe v. MoyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klein v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. McDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schefke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Clare v. FliegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Stout v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API