Legal Opinion

Beck v. International Harvester Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1915No. 12133PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered November 3, 1913, in favor of the defendant, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee engaged in unloading machinery from a car.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant while an employee of the respondent was injured in the course of his employment, and brought the present action to recover in damages therefor. After issue joined, a trial was entered upon before the court sitting with a jury. The appellant presented his case in chief, whereupon the respondent moved for a nonsuit against him on the ground that he had failed to prove a sufficient cause for the jury. This motion the court overruled. The case then proceeded to the close of the evidence, when the respondent challenged its sufficiency to sustain a judgment in favor of the appellant.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. GileWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Jock v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Shephard v. GoveWashington Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frescoln v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tacoma & Eastern Lumber Co. v. Field & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Mattson v. Griffin Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Peoples Electric Co-Operative v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Long v. ShirrodWashington Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API