State ex rel. Roland v. Dreyer
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamus. The effect of the Glascock plat and the effect of the dedications of the public ground dedicated by him upon the plat, have been before the Supreme Court in two separate cases, and in both of these cases the court upheld and sustained the effect and purposes of these dedications.
Read the full summary
Mandamus. The effect of the Glascock plat and the effect of the dedications of the public ground dedicated by him upon the plat, have been before the Supreme Court in two separate cases, and in both of these cases the court upheld and sustained the effect and purposes of these dedications. Hannibal v. Draper, 15 Mo. 635; Hannibal v. Draper, 36 Mo. 332. The following line of decisions in this State, upholds the long established doctrine of the law as to the effect of such dedications. Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315; Hannibal v. Draper, 15 Mo. 635; Brown v. Manning, 6 Ohio 129; Pawlet v.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
— This is an original proceeding in this court to obtain a mandamus from this court against the mayor and officers of the city of Hannibal in their official capacity to cancel and revoke the license and franchise granted by certain ordinances of the said city to the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad company to build and operate its railroad tracks upon and across the public levee of the city of Hannibal and to require the said railroad company to immediately cease operation under said franchise or license and to remove any and all obstruction now placed or being placed upon said public…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Belcher Sugar Refining Co. v. St. Louis Grain Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Vail v. DinningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. City of AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State Ex Rel. R-1 School District of Putnam County v. EwingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- City of St. Louis v. BedalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- City of Kansas City v. Woods Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Swope v. Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.