Legal Opinion
Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 19, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
37 N.J. Super. 522 (1955)
117 A.2d 678
JOHN HEIDEL, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
WALLACE & TIERNAN, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.
Decided October 19, 1955.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch, attorney for the respondent-appellant.
Messrs. Talisman & Golat (Mr. Solomon Golat on the brief), attorney for the petitioner-appellee.
CONLON, J.C.C.
The employer appeals from an award in the Division of Workmen's Compensation on the sole ground that the amount allowed for permanent disability was excessive. There is no disagreement between the parties as to the facts, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Paul v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Calabria v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Bernstein Furniture Co. v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Wendt v. . WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Wright v. Purepac Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Silke v. WalterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Viera v. Level Line, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.