Legal Opinion

Frye v. President of the Bank ex rel. Hardin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1849PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The merits of this suit in chancery are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The decree appealed from was a pro forma decree, entered at October term, 1849, by Woodson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Mr. Justice Trumbull :

The appellees, who were complainants in the Court below, filed their bill against John Shaw and William Frye, alleging that Shaw, for the purpose of securing various sums of money which he owed them, being chiefly borrowed monej', executed two mortgages, one to Atchison and the insurance companies, dated January 21, 1839, and recorded June 15, 1839; the other to the Bank of Illinois, dated April ”21, 1840, and recorded June 3, 1840 ; both mortgages being upon lands lying in Calhoun county. That a large amount of the indebtedness, to secure which said mortgages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. People v. RectorNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. United States v. VansickleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1840
  4. Hughes v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Addison v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Weare v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Crabtree v. HagenbaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Battin v. WoodsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API