Legal Opinion

United States v. Vansickle

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided October 15, 1840PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEAN, Circuit Justice.

The defendant [William Vansickle] was indicted for knowingly and corruptly obstructing the marshal, in the service of a subpoena, on a witness, in certain criminal cases, in which he, with others, was defendant, under the twenty second section of the act of congress of the 30th April, 1790 [1 Stat. 117]. The plea of not guilty was entered, and a jury were called and sworn to try the issue. Remember Lummis, a witness, stated that the defendant took her from place to place while the marshal or his deputy was in pursuit of her to summon her as a witness. That the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Fulton Bank v. BenedictThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Teese v. HuntingdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Kennedy v. UpshawTexas Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API