Legal Opinion

Lee v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1920No. 8366PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Appellee, having judgment against appellant R. H. Lee, by its agent made the statutory affidavit and procured the issuance and service of the writ of garnishment upon the Ajnerican National Insurance Com- ■ pany, which in answer thereto admitted it was indebted to Lee $440.65. Lee intervened, and asserted, in- substance, that the debt due him was exempt from garnishment because it represented wages for personal services rendered by him to W. T. and Leona Hicks, which they were unable to pay at the time, and in payment of which, affer the death of W. T. Hicks, his wife, Leona, assigned that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. McKennellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Bruce v. Koch, Dreyfus & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corp. v. ICO, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Sloan v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. McKeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Sutherland v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Salem v. American Bank of Commerce, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API