Legal Opinion
Hakim v. Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*359OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard F. Braun, J.
This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding. Petitioner seeks a reversal of an order and opinion of respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), and dismissal of the building-wide reduction of services complaint by several tenants to respondent DHCR. By stipulation, one tenant, Cecile Scholberle (Intervenor), was permitted to intervene in this proceeding. Respondent DHCR cross-moves to remit this proceeding to DHCR, but, if such relief is not granted, then said respondent requests an extension of not less than 20 days to answer the verified…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MATTER OF AMSTERDAM-MANHATTAN ASSOCS. v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Schoenstein v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- 47 Clinton Street Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Glenbriar Co. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Tenants Committee of 425 East 86th Street v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hakim v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000