Legal Opinion
MATTER OF AMSTERDAM-MANHATTAN ASSOCS. v. Joy
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
We find that there was unreasonable delay as a matter of law in the Office of Rent Control’s refusal, for a period of over 15 months, to process the landlords’ applica tions for electrical exclusion decrease orders. It is offensive to one’s sense of fairness for these landlords, having timely filed the necessary applications and engaged in a completely proper course of conduct under the pre-existing regulation, to be denied the benefit of the regulation then extant. Under the facts of these cases, the petitioners were entitled to reasonably prompt processing of their applications. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pokoik v. SilsdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Our Lady of Good Counsel Roman Catholic Church & School v. BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- MATTER OF OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCH. v. BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Parkchester Apts. Co. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Taleff Realty Corp. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mayer v. City Rent AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Relay Improvement Ass'n v. Sycamore Realty Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- McDonald's Corp. v. Village of ElmsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Offen v. County Council for Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- People ex rel. Office of Rent Administration, Division of Housing & Community Renewal v. Berry Estates , Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.