Legal Opinion

Stallings Bros. Feed Mill v. Stovall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 2, 1953No. 4-9923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ward, Justice.

Jesse Stovall, appellee, on or about September 1, 1950, became acutely aware of an injury to his back, which injury he thought arose out of and in the course of his employment with appellant. His claim for compensation was disallowed by the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. The Circuit Court, on review, reversed the Commission and Stallings Bros. Feed Mill, the employer, prosecutes this appeal to reinstate the Commission’s findings.

The trial judge, in a comprehensive statement of his findings which evidences much care and ability, reached the conclusion that there was no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGregor & Pickett v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Harding Glass Co. v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Sturgis Brothers v. MaysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Farmer v. L. H. Knight Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Baker v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryant Stave & Heading Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API