Legal Opinion
Cortez v. California Motor Express Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1964No. Civ. 21342PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellant filed suit against his employer, the respondent, California Motor Express Company, Ltd., seeking specific performance and damages for alleged breach of a collective bargaining agreement. Appellant also named his union, Local 85 International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, as a party defendant, but the union has never been served with summons and complaint and has not appeared in the action. Respondent California Motor Express Company, Ltd. moved for summary judgment. After hearing and a consideration of the affidavits of the parties, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cortez v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Jenkins v. Wm. Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Silva v. MercierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nizinski v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Conner v. Dart Transportation ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Painters Dist. Council No. 33 v. MoenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.