Legal Opinion

Harris v. Fox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1908No. 36PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Lee Harris against Isom Williams, in which action plaintiff caused a writ of attachment to issue. Thereafter C. B. Pox, as administrator of the estate of Isom Williams, deceased, moved to quash the attachment, which motion was granted, and Harris brings error.

1Per curiam

On July 7, 1907, Lee Harris, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued' Isom Williams, defendant in error, defendant below, in the United States Court for the Indian Territory, Southern District at Purcell, on a promissory note for $106.-80, and caused a writ of attachment to issue, which was levied upon certain lands belonging to him lying in the Eighteenth recording district of the Indian Territory. Thereafter C. B. Pox, as administrator of defendant appeared and filed answer, in effect a general denial, and on November 13, 1907, filed a motion to quash the levy and discharge the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swope v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
  2. Coyle Mercantile Co. v. Nix, Halsell & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. LammersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API