Coyle Mercantile Co. v. Nix, Halsell & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Pottmoatomie County; "before J. B. Keaton, District Judge. 'Action by Nix, Halsell & Co. against Fox Stephens. The Coyle Mercantile Company also began an attachment against the same defendant. From a judgment in favor of Nix, Halsell & Co., the Coyle Mercantile Company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Tarsney, J.:
On October 26, 1896, Nix, Halsell & Co. commenced an action in the district court of Pottawatomie county against Fox Stephens for goods sold and delivered, and instituted attachment proceedings therein. Neither the petition in said cause nor the affidavit for attachment stated the amount that was due and owing to the plaintiffs therein; the allegation of the petition in relation thereto being “that there is. now due and owing to said plaintiffs from said defendant, on account of said goods so sold and delivered, the sum of $-, for which sum and the cost of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hardin v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Durham v. HeatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collier v. GannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Reister v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Harris v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908