Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1946No. 32216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The plaintiff Maud Anderson sought cancellation of certain deeds theretofore executed by her conveying certain lands to her children, the defendants. It is her theory that same were executed only upon the express promise and agreement of defendants that the lands would be re-conveyed to her by the defendants when the threat of a damage suit against her by a third person was ended. Trial resulted in judgment for defendants, and plaintiff has perfected this appeal.

The gist of plaintiff’s contention here is that the findings of fact are against the clear weight of the evidence and that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Payne v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. McCrory v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Thompson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forshee v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Anderson v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API