Legal Opinion

People in Interest of PEA

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 25, 1988No. 87SA214PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1. The district attorney has appealed from an order in a delinquency proceeding suppressing statements of P.E.A., a minor child, and the marijuana seized by school officials in the search of P.E.A.’s automobile. The trial court concluded that the evidence was obtained in violation of the standards of reasonableness established by New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985) (plurality opinion), and was therefore inadmissible under the fourth amendment. On appeal, the prosecution asserts that the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. CassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Trinidad School District No. 1 v. Lopez Ex Rel. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Outlaw v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. In re D.E.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API