Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision ruling that claimant, a micro assembler, was discharged from her employment due to disqualifying misconduct—namely, being disruptive in the workplace and referring to her department head in derogatory terms. The employer’s representatives testified that claimant and her coworkers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Reyna-BautistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of SarmientoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re the Claim of FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API