Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Worden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1892No. 15,820PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The material facts stated, in the special finding are these: In July, 1887, Harry L. Worden and John E. Zent formed a partnership under the firm name of Worden & Zent. Worden borrowed from his mother $1,000.00 and executed to her his promissory note for that sum. The appellants sold to the firm of Worden & Zent goods to the value of $1,200.00. When this action was begun, Worden & Zent were indebted to McIntosh, Huntington & Co. in the sum of $193.00, and to other persons in divers sums'. Anna Worden, the mother of Harry L. Worden, was born in the year 1829. On the 2d day of June, 1884,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Gilchrist v. GoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. National State Bank v. Sandford Fork & Tool Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State Bank v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Vermillion v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Reagan v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API