Legal Opinion

Cummings v. McIntire

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 16, 2001No. 01-1301PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant James Cummings brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that his right to substantive due process was violated when appellee Allen Mclntire, an on-duty police officer, allegedly struck him unjustifiably as Cummings asked for street directions. The district court granted summary judgment for all defendants. 1 It concluded that Mclntire’s conduct — though deplorable, unprofessional and offensive — did not “shock the conscience,” and thus fell short of establishing a constitutional violation. We affirm.

I. Factual Background

The relevant facts are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Charles v. Shillingford v. Van E. Holmes, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. DePoutot v. RaffaellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Martinez v. CuiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Kennedy Ex Rel. B.D.K. v. Town of BillericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Velez-Diaz v. Vega-IrizarryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API