Cummings v. McIntire
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant James Cummings brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that his right to substantive due process was violated when appellee Allen Mclntire, an on-duty police officer, allegedly struck him unjustifiably as Cummings asked for street directions. The district court granted summary judgment for all defendants. 1 It concluded that Mclntire’s conduct — though deplorable, unprofessional and offensive — did not “shock the conscience,” and thus fell short of establishing a constitutional violation. We affirm.
I. Factual Background
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Charles v. Shillingford v. Van E. Holmes, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- DePoutot v. RaffaellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Martinez v. CuiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Kennedy Ex Rel. B.D.K. v. Town of BillericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Velez-Diaz v. Vega-IrizarryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.