Legal Opinion

Garland v. Anaconda Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1978No. 14132PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Court by the claimant who was denied temporary total disability payments. Claimant Douglas Garland appeals and presents one issue for this Court’s review:

Whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in denying temporary total compensation benefits to an employee who suffered an injury in the course and scope of his employment?

The Anaconda Company, a self-insured employer, refused payments because the employee changed doctors without the consent of the employer.

Douglas Garland was injured in the course and scope of his employment at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rumsey v. Cardinal PetroleumMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Romero v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District Ex Rel. County of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Linton v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gamble v. SearsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Strandberg v. Reber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hutchison v. General Host Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mitchell v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API