Legal Opinion
Pullman Inc. v. W. R. Grace & Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 26, 1976No. CIV-75-0713-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff is the owner of United States Patent No. 3,441,393 (Patent) entitled “Process for the Production of Hydrogen Rich Gas”. Plaintiff alleges that the process covered by said Patent is principally used commercially in the production of ammonia. The instant case arises from the proposed construction of an ammonia plant by Defendants W. R. Grace & Co. (Grace) and its subsidiary Defendant Woodward Chemical Corporation (Woodward) which plant is to be located near Woodward, Oklahoma. In the initial Complaint filed on August 22, 1975, a declaratory judgment was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D.G. Rung Industries, Inc. v. TinnermanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lang v. Pacific Marine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ecodyne Corp. v. Croll-Reynolds Engineering Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Automation Systems, Inc. v. Intel Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.