Legal Opinion
Ecodyne Corp. v. Croll-Reynolds Engineering Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1979No. Civ. B-78-180PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ELLEN B. BURNS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ecodyne Corporation seeks a declaratory judgment that the defendant Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company’s installation of a condensate polishing apparatus in accordance with defendant’s contract with Iowa Southern Utilities Co. will infringe two of plaintiff’s patents. Plaintiff further seeks a permanent injunction against infringement, contributory infringement or inducement to infringe and an award of damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. Defendant Croll-Reynolds has moved for a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Evers v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- D.G. Rung Industries, Inc. v. TinnermanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
- Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lang v. Pacific Marine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.