Skipper v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, Justice:
This is an appeal pursuant to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Section 42-1-10, et seq., of the 1976 Code. The Single Commissioner, Full Commission, and Circuit Court resolved all issues against the employer-appellant. It is axiomatic that the Commission is the fact finder in Workmen’s Compensation cases. Neither the Circuit Court nor this Court may substitute its opinion of the facts when the Commission’s findings are supported by competent evidence. Robinson v. City of Cayce, 265 S. C. 441, 219 S. E. (2d) 835 (1975). Our basic inquiry in this case is whether the Commission’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beam v. State Workmen's Compensation FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Kinsey v. Champion American Service CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Robinson v. City of CayceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. South Carolina State HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Baggott v. Southern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Hall v. Desert Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Bright v. Orr-Lyons MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Dickert v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991