Legal Opinion
Trojan, Inc. v. Shat-R-Shield, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 22, 1988No. 6:08-misc-06007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge, Sitting By Designation.
I. Jurisdiction and Venue are conceded by all parties and are not at issue.
II. The findings of fact were made at the conclusion of trial without benefit of a transcript.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Trojan, Inc. (hereinafter “Trojan”), brought this declaratory judgment action pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, §§ 2201, 2202, and 1338(a), raising two issues: (1) whether it had infringed United States Patent 4,506,189 (hereinafter the “Nolan patent”), and (2) whether the Nolan patentee, defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trojan, Inc. v. Shat-R-Shield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Trojan, Inc. v. Shat-R-Shield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989