Kulick v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 37), Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (doc. 44), and Defendant’s Reply (doc. 48). For the reasons indicated herein, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ Motion.

I. Background

Plaintiff Roy Kulick started working for Defendant Ethicon-Endo Surgery, Inc. (“EES”) as a clinical research director in June 2006 (doc. 14). According to Defendants, only within a few weeks of his employment he began alienating his peers and coworkers, he sent…