Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marine Stevedoring Corp. v. Oosting

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1968No. Nos. 10060, 10298, 10299, 10323Published

1Dissent

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, with whom BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, joins

(dissenting):

I concur in the affirmance of Marine Stevedoring Corporation v. Oosting, in which the longshoreman met his death by drowning, but I respectfully dissent in the other cases, in which the longshoremen died or were injured on the dock. When construing a statute, as we are, it is not for us heedlessly to pursue our own notion of what the congressional judgment should have been or to deal cavalierly with restrictions specified by Congress. Nor do we serve the purpose of eliminating incongruity by transferring it elsewhere…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API